McGinnis Ferry exit on GA-400

Lawmakers at the Georgia House of Representatives made headlines last week by digging up this old idea. The thought of an exit on GA-400 at McGinnis Ferry Road isn’t a new idea. It’s been kicked around by folks like the North Fulton CID and Forsyth County for several years now. Forsyth paid for a justification project to be performed on the exit a few years back. Now it seems that the Georgia DOT has approved the report, taking the project a small step forward.

The justification for this project is clear. This is an economic development project. The fact that the North Fulton CID has hands in it should make that abundantly clear. The exit will do little to alleviate traffic problems. It might actually do more harm than good. No, this project is designed to benefit the owners of large undeveloped land at McGinnis Ferry, Union Hill and the stalled Taubman Mall project.

We’ve talked a lot about how east-west commuting sucks in the northern burbs. McGinnis Ferry is an artery moving people from Gwinnett to north Fulton. Yet somehow it remains a two-lane thoroughfare for most of its distance. Try taking McGinnis Ferry eastbound at rush hour. It’ll jam up in several places. Thankfully the road is four lanes once you hit GA-141.

Adding a ramp from GA-400 may have the detrimental effect of putting more cars on a small country road. Try widening McGinnis Ferry to four lanes all the way to Milton, then let’s talk about adding an exit.

And then there’s the stalled Taubman Mall at Union Hill Road. Haven’t we spent enough tax dollars creating infrastructure improvements for this? Forsyth County built a road and added a lot of sewer capacity to attract this promised upscale mall.  Yet a mall in south Forsyth is still a pipe dream. The only thing we have to show for it is more apartments. Gee, thanks.

Transportation planners should focus on projects that alleviate real traffic problems. This project isn’t one of them. I thought these guys wanted to regain public trust following T-SPLOST’s defeat? Moving this project forward won’t do it.

6 Responses to “McGinnis Ferry exit on GA-400”

  1. David February 25, 2013 at 8:17 pm #

    I’d be for anything that relieves traffic getting off 400 at Windward going West. The fact that traffic backs up there, specifically at rush hour, all the way onto 400 is very dangerous. They need to tackle that before putting money into a McGinnis Ferry exit.

  2. Brooke February 25, 2013 at 11:37 pm #

    My husband and I are paying down our mortgage as fast as we can so that we can move away from this are entirely. No easy way to Sandy Springs (where we both happen to have jobs). Forget about it. We hate living here. Such a shame because it’s a nice place to live if I had time to actually enjoy it.

  3. A February 26, 2013 at 10:55 am #

    I avoid Windward like the plague Monday-Friday from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m….later on Fridays. It’s a mess no matter where you are going and the traffic backs up onto Highway 9. So I would prefer that something be done there first than a new GA 400 exit.

  4. JAH February 27, 2013 at 12:49 pm #

    It’s a shame that Forsyth can drive their poor development oversight all the way down to the county line. This exit, as you correctly observe, does nothing to alleviate traffic, but will add to traffic headaches, all while servicing the needs of a developer. When it comes to Forsyth politicians (I write this sarcastically), who’d a thunk it?

  5. Brian Davis March 2, 2013 at 2:32 am #

    Lee you forget to mention that McGinnis Ferry is also being 4 laned all the way to 400, this exit makes perfect sense with that in mind.

    Most of the ROW has already been acquires by GDOT.

  6. Brian Davis March 2, 2013 at 2:33 am #

    It is nice to see you writing about an issue closer to home aka Forsyth County

Leave a Reply:

Gravatar Image

Switch to our mobile site